how to simplify what i'm doing (AS the solution?)

i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
subquery where values.
a la ...
select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
partialCount1) as perc1,
100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
partialCount2) as perc2
etc
from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
- but I am wondering if there's another way.
The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
and OLAP.
My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
in the question.
Hi
This looks like you are trying to do a pivot, in which case the best
solutions will be at the front end although with SQL 2005 you have the new
pivot function, check out the topic "Using PIVOT and UNPIVOT " in books
online.
John
<rsphere@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137856740.675188.233050@.g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
> percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
> subquery where values.
> a la ...
> select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
> partialCount1) as perc1,
> 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
> partialCount2) as perc2
> etc
> from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
> I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
> So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
> complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
> - but I am wondering if there's another way.
> The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
> experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
> and OLAP.
> My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
> create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
> path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
> end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
> Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
> using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
> is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
> thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
> in the question.
>

how to simplify what i'm doing (AS the solution?)

i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
subquery where values.
a la ...
select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
partialCount1) as perc1,
100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
partialCount2) as perc2
etc
from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
- but I am wondering if there's another way.
The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
and OLAP.
My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
in the question.Hi
This looks like you are trying to do a pivot, in which case the best
solutions will be at the front end although with SQL 2005 you have the new
pivot function, check out the topic "Using PIVOT and UNPIVOT " in books
online.
John
<rsphere@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137856740.675188.233050@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
> percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
> subquery where values.
> a la ...
> select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
> partialCount1) as perc1,
> 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
> partialCount2) as perc2
> etc
> from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
> I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
> So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
> complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
> - but I am wondering if there's another way.
> The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
> experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
> and OLAP.
> My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
> create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
> path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
> end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
> Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
> using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
> is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
> thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
> in the question.
>

how to simplify what i'm doing (AS the solution?)

i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
subquery where values.
a la ...
select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
partialCount1) as perc1,
100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
partialCount2) as perc2
etc
from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
- but I am wondering if there's another way.
The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
and OLAP.
My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
in the question.Hi
This looks like you are trying to do a pivot, in which case the best
solutions will be at the front end although with SQL 2005 you have the new
pivot function, check out the topic "Using PIVOT and UNPIVOT " in books
online.
John
<rsphere@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137856740.675188.233050@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>i need to do create reports that perform queries where the results are
> percentages of total count divided by counts based on different
> subquery where values.
> a la ...
> select 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is x) as
> partialCount1) as perc1,
> 100 * (totalCount/ (select count where columnA value is y) as
> partialCount2) as perc2
> etc
> from myTable where (..bunch of where stuff..)
> I have simplified the above example just for brevity here.
> So, I hate these kinds of nested queries - and they get incredibly
> complex to read. I could break them up into longer scripts to simplify
> - but I am wondering if there's another way.
> The data I am using is from a warehouse on SQL 2005. I have very little
> experience with warehouses - and know little about analysis services
> and OLAP.
> My question is whether it is possible to use Analysis services to
> create new tables that make this data far easier to query? That's the
> path I am considering venturing down, but I don't want to hit a dead
> end... and need just to know if this makes sense. That is to use
> Analysis services to crunch out some new tables from the tables I am
> using which would have the results neatly packaged in a table or 2 that
> is fast and simple to query. Is that the idea of AS?
> thx for helping a learner here. let me know if i am making enough sense
> in the question.
>

How to simplify my endless query. Thanks.

Hello group!

I am having a problem with simplying my query...

I would like to get customers' balance info based on how many months
since they opened their accounts. The tricky part here is accounts
starting with '28' are treated differently than other accounts, they
are given 3 months grace period. In other words, for all other
accounts, their month0 balance is the balance of their open_month, and
month1 balance is the balance after the account is opened 1 month, and
so on. But accounts starting with '28' month0 balance would be the
balance after the account is opened 3 months, and month1 balance would
be the balance after the account is opened 4 months, and so on.

My query below works, but since some customers are more than 10 years
old (more than 120 months), my query is endless! Does anyone know a
better way to do the same job? Many thanks!

create table a
(person_id int
,account int
,open_date datetime)

insert into a values(1,200001,'11/15/2004')
insert into a values(2,280001,'8/20/2004')

create table b
(account int
,balance_date datetime
,balance money)

insert into b values(200001,'11/30/2004',700)
insert into b values(200001,'12/31/2004',800)
insert into b values(200001,'1/31/2005',900)
insert into b values(200001,'2/28/2005',1000)
insert into b values(280001,'8/30/2004',7000)
insert into b values(280001,'9/30/2004',8000)
insert into b values(280001,'10/31/2004',9000)
insert into b values(280001,'11/30/2004',10000)
insert into b values(280001,'12/31/2004',15000)
insert into b values(280001,'1/31/2005',20000)
insert into b values(280001,'2/28/2005',30000)

--Ideal output--

person_idacc_nomonth0_balancemonth1_balancemonth2_balancemonth3_balance
120000017008009001000
2280000110000150002000030000

select a.person_id
,a.account
,month0_balance=case
when a.account like '2%' and a.account not like '28%'
then
sum(case datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date) when 0
then b.balance else 0 end)
else sum(case datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date)
when 3 then b.balance else 0 end)
end
,month1_balance =case
when a.account like '2%' and a.account not like '28%'
then
sum(case datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date) when 1
then b.balance else 0 end)
else sum(case datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date)
when 4 then b.balance else 0 end)
end
from a as a
join b as b
on a.account=b.account
group by a.person_id, a.account(rong.guo@.gmail.com) writes:
> My query below works, but since some customers are more than 10 years
> old (more than 120 months), my query is endless! Does anyone know a
> better way to do the same job? Many thanks!

Hm, first I read endless as "query runs forever", but now I realize
that you want one column for each month.

That's a dynamic cross-tab, which you cannot to in SQL out-of-box,
since a query always produces a table with a well-defined set of
columns.

You could use dynamic SQL to create the beast; you can read about
dynamic SQL on my web site: http://www.sommarskog.se/dynamic_sql.html.
You may also consider the third-party tool RAC, which is very good
for this sort of things. (They say. I have never used it myself, but
it's a standard recommendation.) It's at http://www.rac4sql.net/.

Since I first misread your question, I looked at improving the query.
Since this is a simple join, good indexing is probably the best for
performance. But this maybe somewhat more effective:

select a.person_id, a.account,
month0_balance = SUM(CASE datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date)
WHEN CASE WHEN a.account LIKE '2%' AND
a.account NOT LIKE '28%'
THEN 0
ELSE 3
END THEN b.balance
ELSE 0
END),
month1_balance = SUM(CASE datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date)
WHEN CASE WHEN a.account LIKE '2%' AND
a.account NOT LIKE '28%'
THEN 1
ELSE 4
END THEN b.balance
ELSE 0
END)
from a as a
join b as b on a.account=b.account
group by a.person_id, a.account

(Egads! I have never had a CASE in the WHEN part of a CASE expression
before!)

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp|||Thanks, Erland!
Sorry for the misleading word 'endless'... And you are right, I've
never had a CASE in the WHEN part of a CASE expression:-)) but it is so
exciting to learn! Thanks again!|||On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:20:17 +0000 (UTC), Erland Sommarskog wrote:

> (rong.guo@.gmail.com) writes:
>> My query below works, but since some customers are more than 10 years
>> old (more than 120 months), my query is endless! Does anyone know a
>> better way to do the same job? Many thanks!
> Hm, first I read endless as "query runs forever", but now I realize
> that you want one column for each month.
> That's a dynamic cross-tab, which you cannot to in SQL out-of-box,
> since a query always produces a table with a well-defined set of
> columns.

I would start with this (perhaps as a view) to collect the monthly balances
and do the 3 month correction for 28s:

select a.person_id, a.account,
sum(b.balance) AS MonthBalance,
'Month' + convert(varchar(),
datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date) -
case when a.account LIKE '2%' AND a.account NOT like '28%' then 0
else 3 END)
AS MonthNum
FROM a as a
JOIN b as b on a.account=b.account
GROUP BY a.person_id, a.account,
datediff(mm, a.open_date, balance_date) -
case when a.account LIKE '2%' AND a.account NOT like '28%' then 0
else 3 END

Then I'd put a crosstab tool on the client to consume this.

How to show two dataset with equal & non equal of multiple selection.

Dear Friends,

In my report, I am having Listbox for users to choose Country, City & Company.
The user can choose Country. Based on the country selection, cities will be listed out.
Based on the city selection, Companies will be listed out.
They can choose companies.

Now, I have to show two set of results.

A. List of Companies as per selection ( dataset with equal to selection )

B. List of Companies which are not selected ( ie dataset with not equal to selection )

I have created a dataset with all companies and filter it by selection. When I tried with the filter option in the Dataset, I am able to check for only one value and not for multiple value. If the selection is one company, then I can filter it. But if they choose 5 companies, I am not not able to filter it. Is there any other option I can try out.

Please advice. Thanks.

warm regards
Rakin
Singapore.

It sounds like you are using RS 2005, since you have multi value report parameters.

On the filter tab, you can set the filter operator to "IN" (this is the last entry in the list of filter operators). Assuming that your Company report parameter is marked as "multi-value", you can then use the following filter settings:

Filter expression: =Fields!CompanyName.Value
Filter operator: IN
Filter value: =Parameters!Company.Value

The IN-filter can automatically deal with multi-value parameters (which represent an array of values).

-- Robert

|||

Thanks Robert.

You are right. I am using RS 2005.

Now, I am able to get the value for the first option. ( with IN )

But I could n't find any NOT IN option in the filter for the second set of results ?

Could you please advice for this ?

Regards
Rakin

|||

Rakin, a "not in" filter is currently not natively supported in Reporting Services. You would need to look into ways of achieving this directly in the query by using the NOT IN clause:

E.g. select * from products where ReorderLevel not IN (@.Level)

I also attached a small sample report at the bottom based on the Northwind database.

-- Robert

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Report xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2005/01/reportdefinition" xmlns:rd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQLServer/reporting/reportdesigner">
<DataSources>
<DataSource Name="Northwind">
<DataSourceReference>Northwind</DataSourceReference>
<rd:DataSourceID>9904b9f4-d569-4718-a75a-b7fb657657fd</rd:DataSourceID>
</DataSource>
</DataSources>
<BottomMargin>1in</BottomMargin>
<RightMargin>1in</RightMargin>
<ReportParameters>
<ReportParameter Name="Level">
<DataType>Integer</DataType>
<Prompt>Level</Prompt>
<ValidValues>
<ParameterValues>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>0</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>5</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>10</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>15</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>20</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>25</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>30</Value>
</ParameterValue>
</ParameterValues>
</ValidValues>
<MultiValue>true</MultiValue>
</ReportParameter>
</ReportParameters>
<rd:DrawGrid>true</rd:DrawGrid>
<InteractiveWidth>8.5in</InteractiveWidth>
<rd:SnapToGrid>true</rd:SnapToGrid>
<Body>
<ReportItems>
<Matrix Name="matrix1">
<MatrixColumns>
<MatrixColumn>
<Width>1in</Width>
</MatrixColumn>
</MatrixColumns>
<Left>0.125in</Left>
<RowGroupings>
<RowGrouping>
<Width>1in</Width>
<DynamicRows>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="ReorderLevel">
<rd:DefaultName>ReorderLevel</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>1</ZIndex>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
<Sorting>
<SortBy>
<SortExpression>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</SortExpression>
<Direction>Ascending</Direction>
</SortBy>
</Sorting>
<Grouping Name="matrix1_ReorderLevel">
<GroupExpressions>
<GroupExpression>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</GroupExpression>
</GroupExpressions>
</Grouping>
</DynamicRows>
</RowGrouping>
</RowGroupings>
<ColumnGroupings>
<ColumnGrouping>
<DynamicColumns>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="CategoryID">
<rd:DefaultName>CategoryID</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>2</ZIndex>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Fields!CategoryID.Value</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
<Grouping Name="matrix1_CategoryID">
<GroupExpressions>
<GroupExpression>=Fields!CategoryID.Value</GroupExpression>
</GroupExpressions>
</Grouping>
</DynamicColumns>
<Height>0.25in</Height>
</ColumnGrouping>
</ColumnGroupings>
<DataSetName>DataSet1</DataSetName>
<Top>0.25in</Top>
<Width>2in</Width>
<Corner>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="textbox1">
<rd:DefaultName>textbox1</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>3</ZIndex>
<Style>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value />
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
</Corner>
<Height>0.5in</Height>
<MatrixRows>
<MatrixRow>
<Height>0.25in</Height>
<MatrixCells>
<MatrixCell>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="ProductID">
<rd:DefaultName>ProductID</rd:DefaultName>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Count(Fields!ProductID.Value)</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
</MatrixCell>
</MatrixCells>
</MatrixRow>
</MatrixRows>
</Matrix>
</ReportItems>
<Height>1.25in</Height>
</Body>
<rd:ReportID>ed5d6416-a54d-4c50-8568-8f5bae4484cf</rd:ReportID>
<LeftMargin>1in</LeftMargin>
<DataSets>
<DataSet Name="DataSet1">
<Query>
<rd:UseGenericDesigner>true</rd:UseGenericDesigner>
<CommandText>select * from products where ReorderLevel not IN (@.Level)</CommandText>
<QueryParameters>
<QueryParameter Name="@.Level">
<Value>=Parameters!Level.Value</Value>
</QueryParameter>
</QueryParameters>
<DataSourceName>Northwind</DataSourceName>
</Query>
<Fields>
<Field Name="ProductID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ProductID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="ProductName">
<rd:TypeName>System.String</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ProductName</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="SupplierID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>SupplierID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="CategoryID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>CategoryID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="QuantityPerUnit">
<rd:TypeName>System.String</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>QuantityPerUnit</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitPrice">
<rd:TypeName>System.Decimal</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitPrice</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitsInStock">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitsInStock</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitsOnOrder">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitsOnOrder</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="ReorderLevel">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ReorderLevel</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="Discontinued">
<rd:TypeName>System.Boolean</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>Discontinued</DataField>
</Field>
</Fields>
</DataSet>
</DataSets>
<Width>2.5in</Width>
<InteractiveHeight>11in</InteractiveHeight>
<Language>en-US</Language>
<TopMargin>1in</TopMargin>
</Report>

|||

In RS 2005, I have a report with 5 report parameters. Two of those parameters are query based in order to populate drop down lists in the report for the user.

The BUG occurs when the report initialises: the first query based parameter is populated but the second query-based parameter is blank. I select the available values in both parameters and click on the "View Report" button but the same BUG occurs: the first parameter is populated but the second parameter's values are reset. If I select values from both and click the View Report button a few times it will eventually display the report.

Have any of you encountered anything like this?

Niall

How to show two dataset with equal & non equal of multiple selection.

Dear Friends,

In my report, I am having Listbox for users to choose Country, City & Company.
The user can choose Country. Based on the country selection, cities will be listed out.
Based on the city selection, Companies will be listed out.
They can choose companies.

Now, I have to show two set of results.

A. List of Companies as per selection ( dataset with equal to selection )

B. List of Companies which are not selected ( ie dataset with not equal to selection )

I have created a dataset with all companies and filter it by selection. When I tried with the filter option in the Dataset, I am able to check for only one value and not for multiple value. If the selection is one company, then I can filter it. But if they choose 5 companies, I am not not able to filter it. Is there any other option I can try out.

Please advice. Thanks.

warm regards
Rakin
Singapore.

It sounds like you are using RS 2005, since you have multi value report parameters.

On the filter tab, you can set the filter operator to "IN" (this is the last entry in the list of filter operators). Assuming that your Company report parameter is marked as "multi-value", you can then use the following filter settings:

Filter expression: =Fields!CompanyName.Value
Filter operator: IN
Filter value: =Parameters!Company.Value

The IN-filter can automatically deal with multi-value parameters (which represent an array of values).

-- Robert

|||

Thanks Robert.

You are right. I am using RS 2005.

Now, I am able to get the value for the first option. ( with IN )

But I could n't find any NOT IN option in the filter for the second set of results ?

Could you please advice for this ?

Regards
Rakin

|||

Rakin, a "not in" filter is currently not natively supported in Reporting Services. You would need to look into ways of achieving this directly in the query by using the NOT IN clause:

E.g. select * from products where ReorderLevel not IN (@.Level)

I also attached a small sample report at the bottom based on the Northwind database.

-- Robert

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Report xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2005/01/reportdefinition" xmlns:rd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQLServer/reporting/reportdesigner">
<DataSources>
<DataSource Name="Northwind">
<DataSourceReference>Northwind</DataSourceReference>
<rd:DataSourceID>9904b9f4-d569-4718-a75a-b7fb657657fd</rd:DataSourceID>
</DataSource>
</DataSources>
<BottomMargin>1in</BottomMargin>
<RightMargin>1in</RightMargin>
<ReportParameters>
<ReportParameter Name="Level">
<DataType>Integer</DataType>
<Prompt>Level</Prompt>
<ValidValues>
<ParameterValues>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>0</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>5</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>10</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>15</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>20</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>25</Value>
</ParameterValue>
<ParameterValue>
<Value>30</Value>
</ParameterValue>
</ParameterValues>
</ValidValues>
<MultiValue>true</MultiValue>
</ReportParameter>
</ReportParameters>
<rd:DrawGrid>true</rd:DrawGrid>
<InteractiveWidth>8.5in</InteractiveWidth>
<rd:SnapToGrid>true</rd:SnapToGrid>
<Body>
<ReportItems>
<Matrix Name="matrix1">
<MatrixColumns>
<MatrixColumn>
<Width>1in</Width>
</MatrixColumn>
</MatrixColumns>
<Left>0.125in</Left>
<RowGroupings>
<RowGrouping>
<Width>1in</Width>
<DynamicRows>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="ReorderLevel">
<rd:DefaultName>ReorderLevel</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>1</ZIndex>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
<Sorting>
<SortBy>
<SortExpression>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</SortExpression>
<Direction>Ascending</Direction>
</SortBy>
</Sorting>
<Grouping Name="matrix1_ReorderLevel">
<GroupExpressions>
<GroupExpression>=Fields!ReorderLevel.Value</GroupExpression>
</GroupExpressions>
</Grouping>
</DynamicRows>
</RowGrouping>
</RowGroupings>
<ColumnGroupings>
<ColumnGrouping>
<DynamicColumns>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="CategoryID">
<rd:DefaultName>CategoryID</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>2</ZIndex>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Fields!CategoryID.Value</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
<Grouping Name="matrix1_CategoryID">
<GroupExpressions>
<GroupExpression>=Fields!CategoryID.Value</GroupExpression>
</GroupExpressions>
</Grouping>
</DynamicColumns>
<Height>0.25in</Height>
</ColumnGrouping>
</ColumnGroupings>
<DataSetName>DataSet1</DataSetName>
<Top>0.25in</Top>
<Width>2in</Width>
<Corner>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="textbox1">
<rd:DefaultName>textbox1</rd:DefaultName>
<ZIndex>3</ZIndex>
<Style>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value />
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
</Corner>
<Height>0.5in</Height>
<MatrixRows>
<MatrixRow>
<Height>0.25in</Height>
<MatrixCells>
<MatrixCell>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="ProductID">
<rd:DefaultName>ProductID</rd:DefaultName>
<Style>
<TextAlign>Right</TextAlign>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
</Style>
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<Value>=Count(Fields!ProductID.Value)</Value>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
</MatrixCell>
</MatrixCells>
</MatrixRow>
</MatrixRows>
</Matrix>
</ReportItems>
<Height>1.25in</Height>
</Body>
<rd:ReportID>ed5d6416-a54d-4c50-8568-8f5bae4484cf</rd:ReportID>
<LeftMargin>1in</LeftMargin>
<DataSets>
<DataSet Name="DataSet1">
<Query>
<rd:UseGenericDesigner>true</rd:UseGenericDesigner>
<CommandText>select * from products where ReorderLevel not IN (@.Level)</CommandText>
<QueryParameters>
<QueryParameter Name="@.Level">
<Value>=Parameters!Level.Value</Value>
</QueryParameter>
</QueryParameters>
<DataSourceName>Northwind</DataSourceName>
</Query>
<Fields>
<Field Name="ProductID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ProductID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="ProductName">
<rd:TypeName>System.String</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ProductName</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="SupplierID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>SupplierID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="CategoryID">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>CategoryID</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="QuantityPerUnit">
<rd:TypeName>System.String</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>QuantityPerUnit</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitPrice">
<rd:TypeName>System.Decimal</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitPrice</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitsInStock">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitsInStock</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="UnitsOnOrder">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>UnitsOnOrder</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="ReorderLevel">
<rd:TypeName>System.Int16</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>ReorderLevel</DataField>
</Field>
<Field Name="Discontinued">
<rd:TypeName>System.Boolean</rd:TypeName>
<DataField>Discontinued</DataField>
</Field>
</Fields>
</DataSet>
</DataSets>
<Width>2.5in</Width>
<InteractiveHeight>11in</InteractiveHeight>
<Language>en-US</Language>
<TopMargin>1in</TopMargin>
</Report>

|||

In RS 2005, I have a report with 5 report parameters. Two of those parameters are query based in order to populate drop down lists in the report for the user.

The BUG occurs when the report initialises: the first query based parameter is populated but the second query-based parameter is blank. I select the available values in both parameters and click on the "View Report" button but the same BUG occurs: the first parameter is populated but the second parameter's values are reset. If I select values from both and click the View Report button a few times it will eventually display the report.

Have any of you encountered anything like this?

Niall

sql

How to show duplicate rows in Report Builder ?

Hi!
I've created a report in Report Builder, based on a query. When I run the report in Report Builder, it doesn't show the duplicates rows, even if it works fine in Data source view.

How can I see al rows in Report Builder(even if they're duplicates) ?

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
VV
Report Builder shows groups of data, if the data you gropued does not contain a unique column, the data will be grouped, if you want to display all rows, you will need to display column which is different in the mutli-instanced rows.

Jens K. Suessmeyer.

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

How to set "0" instead of blank spaces to a column or field.

Hi i hv a doubt in Sql server reporting..I do generate some reports based on some criteria.In the results screen i hv empty fields based on the search i hv generated.I need to set "0" instead of blank spaces in the fields..Can any one help me?

What about using either using SQL Server logic to tranform the data or use reporting services to encapsulate the logic

CASE LEN(LTRIM(RTRIM(SomeColumn))) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE SomeColumn END

would be the SQL Server alternative

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

|||I do use a select query from a view in my .rdl file.While selecting i need to set "0" to some columns which ever is null.Will it works?|||

CASE LEN(LTRIM(RTRIM(ISNULL(SomeColumn,'')))) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE SomeColumn END

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

How to set "0" instead of blank spaces to a column or field.

Hi i hv a doubt in Sql server reporting..I do generate some reports based on some criteria.In the results screen i hv empty fields based on the search i hv generated.I need to set "0" instead of blank spaces in the fields..Can any one help me?

What about using either using SQL Server logic to tranform the data or use reporting services to encapsulate the logic

CASE LEN(LTRIM(RTRIM(SomeColumn))) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE SomeColumn END

would be the SQL Server alternative

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de

|||I do use a select query from a view in my .rdl file.While selecting i need to set "0" to some columns which ever is null.Will it works?|||

CASE LEN(LTRIM(RTRIM(ISNULL(SomeColumn,'')))) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE SomeColumn END

Jens K. Suessmeyer

http://www.sqlserver2005.de